IIVY runs a project's real phone, text, and email correspondence, so trust isn't a feature — it's the architecture. Data is siloed per project and private per principal from the first contact; every action is disclosed, logged, and governed by the guardrails you set; and the record is append-only and evidence-linked, so it can be trusted precisely because it can't be quietly rewritten.
Large orgs assign and revoke access constantly — subs roll on, consultants roll off, a trade needs one folder and nothing else. IIVY is built for exactly that, with fail-closed gates enforced in the database, not the prompt.
IIVY runs the job on its own. What you control is the leash: what it can send, to whom, and when — enforced by which capabilities are switched on, not by asking the model to behave.
The journal has no edit path. Every entry — event, evidence, decision, outcome — is written as it happens and linked by citation to the exact document or message that proves it. A correction is a new, marked entry; the original stays visible. That's what makes it defensible.
IIVY runs on the channels the job already uses, and it respects the rules that govern them.
The architecture above is how the system is built today. Formal certifications and enterprise controls (SOC 2, SSO/SAML, a signed DPA, and data-residency options) are on our roadmap — the enterprise brief lays out exactly what's in place now and what's in flight. We'd rather tell you the truth than show you a badge we haven't earned.
A security and rollout one-pager for procurement, InfoSec, and legal — the current controls, the roadmap, and how a scoped pilot starts and stays reversible.